Durant, the Warriors, LeBron, “super-teams” and your 2016-17 NBA season in retrospect

I received an interesting text from a friend the other morning following the aftermath of Game Five.  It read as follows…

“Everything we thought was wrong with that move… was in the end.  Lame season in reality.”

The text came from Croshere.

I knew these bitter words from the fingertips of a rather cheery fellow stemmed from three factors.

1) Finality.  The NBA season was over.  For Croshere, myself and every other homer with the NBA package, we experience an inevitable post-season depression that lasts for several weeks.  No hoops for a solid three months.  No dunks, no Durant, no love, no LeBron.  This is the summer of our discontent.

2) Homerism.  Croshere hails from Ohio and while not necessarily a Cavs fan per se, there’s a part of him that can’t help but root for this team to succeed.  He’s also a fan of LeBron and appreciates the fact that we are seeing a once-in-a-lifetime athlete, regardless of where you place him on your own personal (and inevitably biased) scale of the greatest players ever.  And, finally…

3) Honesty.  There was a ring of truth to what he said.  For an entire year, all we could talk about was Kevin Durant joining the Golden State Warriors and how the outcome of this season, Cavs versus Warriors with the Warriors ultimately winning, was inevitable.

All that aside, let’s be honest.  What we just witnessed was pretty insane.  The Warriors have won 67-plus games in their last three seasons.  What they threw out in these Finals was as close to indefensible basketball as we’ve ever seen.

There was one play in Monday night’s closer that you probably didn’t notice but it symbolized exactly how difficult these Warriors are to defend.  It was just another, routine play for Golden State, brilliant in its simplicity but as effective as we’ve ever seen.  Curry drove the lane on the right side and immediately drew a double team.  As soon as he was doubled, he quickly passed to ball to Kevin Durant, who himself drew a double team with the Cavs quick to rotate.  Durant then passed the ball to a wide-open Klay Thompson on the left wing who drilled a three-pointer.  Not even Velcro could have covered these Warriors.

Which brings us back to the question of whether it was fair that the already-strong Warriors landed the second-best player in the league.

Another faithful reader of mine, and he knows who he is, still laments the David Stern veto of the Chris Paul trade that would have sent him to that other Los Angeles team, shifting the league’s balance of power and at a minimum keeping the Lakers relevant.

Say what you will about the league’s current state of affairs but there is an incredible maldistribution of wealth.  Today’s NBA looks like a third world nation with the rich (Warriors) sitting atop their hillside mansion looking down at the peasants (NBA’s other 31 teams) as they struggle to attain that wealth, knowing in all likelihood it won’t happen for a long, long time.

So, the question we (and more importantly the Commissioner) have to ask is… is this good for the league?  Sure, we’re witnessing history but at what expense?

My response to Croshere’s text was simple.  Without Durant, it is perfectly conceivable that these Cavaliers beat the Warriors… again.  They did so last year.

This year, Durant proved more than just an X-Factor.  The Cavaliers, who by all intents and purposes are a well-conditioned team, were gassed having to cover the Warriors.  They have three players than can take (and make) shots from forty feet out. Note: Durant shot 47% from three-point in the Finals.  That’s a lot of court to cover.

But is this fair?

I can’t say I have the answer to that question.  Is the Golden State front office not supposed to assemble the best team possible?  When Durant declared for free agency, were they not supposed to make their pitch?

When Gary Payton and Karl Malone joined Shaq and Kobe (remember that?), we all thought the Lakers would steamroll to another championship. They got swept by the Pistons in the Finals.  When Charles Barkley flew west to Phoenix, that team was supposed to topple Michael Jordan’s Bulls.  That didn’t happen either.

These Warriors are not the first “super-team” we’ve ever seen.  They’re just the best.  A lot had to happen to get them to fire on all cylinders.  That includes a front office philosophy and head coach (and his staff) who kept a loose yet focused locker room.

In the end, it is what it is.  The glass half empty NBA fan sees this disparity as bad for the league.  To them I say ratings are the highest they’ve been in twenty years.  The glass half-full NBA fan recognizes we just saw one of the greatest teams ever assembled.  To them I say I hope you’re a Warriors fan because if you’re not, the team you’re rooting isn’t coming anywhere close the next few years.

When asked about whether the Warriors’ dominance was good or bad for the NBA, Commissioner Silver replied that the league is always in flux, that the Warriors’ dominance should inspire other teams to become even better.

Here’s hoping they’re ready because based on what we just witnessed, they’re going to need a lot of inspiration.

Please follow and like us:
Pin Share

6 Replies to “Durant, the Warriors, LeBron, “super-teams” and your 2016-17 NBA season in retrospect”

  1. How fickle we are as sports fans. Asking if Golden State is good for the NBA is like asking was Michael Jordon good for the game? I’m not to old to remember, (which means most of your readers aren’t either), when the Lakers were a dominant team in the 80’s and in 3 out of 4 years played the Celtics, another dominant franchise. During those golden years, when they won 5 in 10 years, (back to back in 87-88), folks cried the same unfair and thought they, (we 🙂 ) were the team of the century…
    What was Golden State doing during those years? Certainly not enough to gain the attention they are deservedly getting now. Perhaps, just perhaps, they were trying to build on the concept of a coach and team that could grow the franchise, and get to the NBA promised land. Now that they have accomplished that, everyone wants to cry foul because KD made a life choice/career decision in his best interest and it happened to work out for him. The one thing I can agree with the commish on, is teams now get to try and build their teams to be more competitive with the current bar. I think too, that part of that is team chemistry. KD didn’t come in and change what the warriors were doing to suit his game, he fit into their style of play which, again, happened to work out for him.
    So, it’s just not about raw talent. There has to be a fit, a balance and understanding/by in on what the ultimate goal is and how as a TEAM, we’re going to get there.
    Yes…they are good for the game. They as an organization have done what other teams need to do. Hire a coach with a plan that is clearly visible to ownership, the players, and staff…then go out and execute!

  2. I have no problem with how the Warriors put their squad together.
    The results and ratings speak for themselves.
    It was riveting tv and a great series.

    And as a droolingly loyal Lakers fan, the only problem I have with it is that it happened up in Nancy Pelosiville instead of in P&G down here at Staples Center. Thanks alot David Sternhole.

    BTW, I ain’t alone on my veto take.
    …Even a notorious Celtics homer can see it how badly Stern reamed us and how it reverberated throughout the league:


  3. The NBA has become trite and almost trivial. Within the Eastern Conference it has become a real joke . The Cleveland Cavaliers as we can now see , they’re not as good as advertised even with idiocy of the statements being made Kyrie Irving is a good complement to LeBron James. Clearly that wasn’t the case when you look at the series and see how sporadic Irving’s performances were. Overrated and clearly overpaid with regard to the whole makeup of the team. What’s now left for David Griffin as the general manager , his still listening to LeBron as which players the franchise now needs to acquire ? In the space of five non-competitive games the Cleveland Cavaliers have been exposed as a fraud . As for the optimism of fans who believe and yearn for a rivalry , well that won’t be happening anytime soon .

  4. Are you calling my readers old, Mony?

    I think they resemble that remark. I prefer to think of them as distinguished… or at a minimum, lightly seasoned.

    We’ve been thirsting for a good, hearty NBA rivalry for some time now. I guess we should be careful what we ask for.

    By the way, LeBron Tweeted out a picture of him in the gym just the other day. It was a selfie of him, ripped, standing and looking menacing over a weight rack. It read something about his nice, long two-day vacation.

    No rest for the wicked.

  5. All that said, Bleed, I do miss me some Stern. He was quite the soundbite.

    There was nothing like him when it came to handling the boos that reigned from the draft room halls.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *